Contrast to prima facie Res ipsa loquitur is often confused with prima facie ("at first sight"), the common law doctrine that a party must show some minimum amount of evidence before a trial is worthwhile. Source: Internet
Res ipsa loquitur does not shift any burden of proof or onus from one party to the other. Source: Internet
If found, res ipsa loquitur creates an inference of negligence, although in most cases it does not necessarily result in a directed verdict. Source: Internet
In some cases, a closed group of people may be held in breach of a duty of care under the rule of res ipsa loquitur. Source: Internet
In this case, the plaintiff could not be assisted by res ipsa loquitur and had to go on to prove that the flat tire was caused by the transport company's negligence. Source: Internet
Res ipsa loquitur means that because the facts are so obvious, a party need not explain any more. Source: Internet